🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.